ILR: The Ralph Lauren Debate: Unusual Resolution Sparks Questions About Jurisdiction, Declinations

Normal
0

21

false
false
false

DE
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:“Normale Tabelle“;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:““;
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:“Times New Roman“,“serif“;}
Main Justice | Subscription Required | Jun 10, 2013

Ralph Lauren Corporation’s April foreign bribery non-prosecution agreements have dawn opposite reactions from the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act defense bar: The apparel manufacturer caught a lucky break – or it got a raw deal.

Read more: http://www.mainjustice.com/justanticorruption/2013/06/06/the-ralph-lauren-debate-unusual-resolution-sparks-questions-about-jurisdiction-declinations/?utm_medium=Email&utm_source=ExactTarget&utm_campaign=&utm_content=

Normal
0

21

false
false
false

DE
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4