US-Klage gegen ALSTE Technologies GmbH (Fortsetzung)

30. April 2010; DECLARATION of Tanja Giacovelli re Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Renewed) filed by ALSTE Technologies ; Verfahrensdokumente:

MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION for Summary Judgment (Renewed) filed by Plaintiff ;Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Sehen Sie für weitere Verfahrensdokumente den Blogeintrag vom 10.März 2010. Der Kläger fordert USD 79.804,00 zzgl. Zinsen aufgrund Vertragsverletzung (Reseller Agreement) . Man kann davon ausgehen, dass Kläger und Beklagte am Ende des Verfahrens jeweils mindestens Verfahrenskosten in gleicher Höhe haben, eine Kostenerstattung gibt es grundsätzlich nicht; man darf also darauf gespannt sein, wann sich die Parteien außergerichtlich einigen, wobei die lange Verfahrensdauer eher gegen ein rasches Ende spricht.

Electronic Case Filing System, District of Utah (Central) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08-cv-00569-TC-PMW

Accessdata v. ALSTE Technologies
Assigned to: Judge Tena Campbell
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

04/30/2010 83 DECLARATION of Tanja Giacovelli re 82 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Renewed) filed by ALSTE Technologies. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
04/30/2010 82 Defendant’s MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Renewed) filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
03/30/2010 81 AFFIDAVIT of L. Rex Sears in Support re 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Renewed) filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
03/30/2010 80 AFFIDAVIT of Timothy Leehealey in Support re 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Renewed) filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
03/30/2010 79 MEMORANDUM in Support re 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Renewed) filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
03/30/2010 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Renewed) filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
01/27/2010 77 RESPONSE re 74 Order on Motion for Scheduling Order,, filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 01/27/2010)
01/27/2010 76 RESPONSE re 74 Order on Motion for Scheduling Order,, filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/27/2010)
01/21/2010 75 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Document Production. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 1/21/10 (alt) (Entered: 01/21/2010)
01/20/2010 74 DOCKET TEXT ORDER taking under advisement 68 Motion for Scheduling Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before January 27, 2010, each party shall file a summary of all discovery taken to date; all discovery that party proposes to take, itemizing each deposition and the location thereof; and the reason discovery proposed to be taken has not been taken prior to this date.
Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 1/20/10. No attached document. (DN) (Entered: 01/20/2010)
01/12/2010 73 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re 68 Plaintiff’s MOTION for Scheduling Order, 59 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Document Production, and for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/12/2010)
01/05/2010 72 REPLY to Response to Motion re 68 Plaintiff’s MOTION for Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/05/2010)
12/23/2009 71 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 68 Plaintiff’s MOTION for Scheduling Order filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 12/23/2009)
12/14/2009 70 Modification of Docket: Error: The wrong party was chosen as the filer. Correction: The correct party was added as the filer, re 68 Plaintiff’s MOTION for Scheduling Order. (rlr) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
12/14/2009 69 MEMORANDUM in Support re 68 Plaintiff’s MOTION for Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
12/14/2009 68 Plaintiff’s MOTION for Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff Accessdata . (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Paul M. Warner.(Sears, Lannie) Modified on 12/14/2009 – Changed the filer from Alste Technologies to Accessdata per call to the help desk (rlr). (Entered: 12/14/2009)
11/09/2009 Modification of Docket re 67 Memorandum in Support of Motion. Error: Filer used the „Memorandum in Support“ filing event instead of the correct „Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion“ event. Correction: Altered entry text to reflect that the document is the filer’s Reply Memorandum (alt) (Entered: 11/09/2009)
11/09/2009 67 REPLY MEMORANDUM in Support re 59 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Document Production, and for Sanctions filed by Counter Defendant Accessdata, Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) Modified on 11/9/2009: changed text to reflect that this is a Reply Memo (alt) (Entered: 11/09/2009)
11/02/2009 Modification of Docket re 66 Declaration. Error: Declaration did not link to motion being briefed. Correction: Created link to underlying 59 motion and corrected entry text to reflect that document is in opposition to that motion (alt) (Entered: 11/09/2009)
11/02/2009 66 DECLARATION of Samuel A. Wong in Opposition to 59 Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Document Production filed by ALSTE Technologies. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Wong, Samuel) Modified on 11/9/2009: corrected text and created link to underlying motion being opposed (alt) (Entered: 11/02/2009)
11/02/2009 65 Defendant’s MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 59 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Document Production, and for Sanctions filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 11/02/2009)
10/27/2009 64 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 62 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 10/27/09 (Attachments: # 1 Checklist for Filing Documents Under Seal) (alt) (Entered: 10/27/2009)
10/26/2009 63 ANSWER to 34 Counterclaim (First Amended) filed by Accessdata.(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 10/26/2009)
10/26/2009 62 Stipulated MOTION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Stipulated Protective Order) Motions referred to Paul M. Warner.(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 10/26/2009)
10/21/2009 61 AFFIDAVIT of L. Rex Sears in Support re 59 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Document Production, and for Sanctions filed by Counter Defendant Accessdata, Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 10/21/2009)
10/21/2009 60 MEMORANDUM in Support re 59 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Document Production, and for Sanctions filed by Counter Defendant Accessdata, Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 10/21/2009)
10/21/2009 59 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Document Production, and for Sanctions filed by Counter Defendant Accessdata, Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Paul M. Warner.(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 10/21/2009)
10/07/2009 58 MEMORANDUM DECISION Granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion to Dismiss. ALSTE’s counterclaim for breach of the Training Partner Agreement is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 10/7/2009. (ce) (Entered: 10/07/2009)
08/21/2009 57 Reply BRIEF re 35 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 08/21/2009)
08/11/2009 56 BRIEF re 35 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 08/11/2009)
07/30/2009 55 ORDER: parties are to submit additional briefing exploring issues re 35 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/29/09 (alt) (Entered: 07/30/2009)
07/29/2009 Deadlines/Hearings terminated.The motion hearing set for 7/30/2009 is stricken from the calendar. An order will be issued on the briefs.(mjm) (Entered: 07/29/2009)
07/29/2009 54 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 50 Motion to Reconsider 49 Memorandum Decision. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/29/09 (alt) (Entered: 07/29/2009)
07/15/2009 53 REPLY to Response to Motion re 50 Plaintiff’s MOTION To Reconsider Order Denying Summary Judgment re 49 Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,, Memorandum Decision filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 07/15/2009)
07/08/2009 52 Defendant’s MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 50 Plaintiff’s MOTION To Reconsider Order Denying Summary Judgment re 49 Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,, Memorandum Decision filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 07/08/2009)
06/24/2009 51 MEMORANDUM in Support re 50 Plaintiff’s MOTION To Reconsider Order Denying Summary Judgment re 49 Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,, Memorandum Decision filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Order and Memorandum Decision)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 06/24/2009)
06/24/2009 50 Plaintiff’s MOTION To Reconsider Order Denying Summary Judgment re 49 Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,, Memorandum Decision filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. Motions referred to Paul M. Warner.(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 06/24/2009)
06/18/2009 49 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 44 Motion to Strike; withdrawing as moot 6 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 6/18/09 (alt) (Entered: 06/18/2009)
06/01/2009 48 REPLY to Response to Motion re 35 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
05/20/2009 47 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: 35 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims : (Notice generated by Mary Jane McNamee) Motion Hearing set for 7/30/2009 at 2:30 PM in Room 230 before Judge Tena Campbell. (mjm) (Entered: 05/20/2009)
05/19/2009 45 MEMORANDUM in Support re 44 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Strike 43 Affidavit filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 05/19/2009)
05/19/2009 44 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Strike 43 Affidavit filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Paul M. Warner.(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 05/19/2009)
05/17/2009 43 AFFIDAVIT of Tanja Giacovelli re 42 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 05/17/2009)
05/17/2009 42 Supplemental MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 05/17/2009)
05/13/2009 41 AFFIDAVIT of Tanja Giacovelli re 40 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
05/13/2009 40 Defendant’s MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 35 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by Counter Claimant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
05/11/2009 39 Supplemental MEMORANDUM in Support re 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 05/11/2009)
04/30/2009 46 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Tena Campbell: Motion Hearing held on 4/30/2009 re 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Accessdata, 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Jurisdictional Grounds filed by ALSTE Technologies. The Court hears oral argument and takes the matters under advisement. The Court inquires of mediation and suggests cnsl meet and discuss. Pla may file amended complaint. Attorney for Plaintiff: Lannie Sears, Attorney for Defendant Sean Egan, Samuel Wong. Court Reporter: Becky Janke. (mjm) (Entered: 05/19/2009)
04/29/2009 38 ERRATA to 37 Affidavit in Support of Motion, 35 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 04/29/2009)
04/10/2009 37 AFFIDAVIT of Timothy Leehealey in Support re 35 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 04/10/2009)
04/10/2009 36 MEMORANDUM in Support re 35 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 04/10/2009)
04/10/2009 35 Plaintiff’s MOTION to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 04/10/2009)
03/27/2009 34 First Amended ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand, Amended COUNTERCLAIM for Breach of Contract against Accessdata filed by ALSTE Technologies.(Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 03/27/2009)
03/20/2009 33 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Accessdata, Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (ce) (Entered: 03/20/2009)
03/18/2009 32 ORDER granting 28 Motion for More Definite Statement: Within 10 days from the date of this order, Defendant shall file and serve an amended answer and counterclaim for breach of contract. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/18/09 (alt) (Entered: 03/18/2009)
03/06/2009 31 NOTICE of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for More Definite Statement by ALSTE Technologies re 28 Plaintiff’s MOTION for More Definite Statement (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 03/06/2009)
02/26/2009 30 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. Motion referred to Paul M. Warner. So Ordered by Judge Tena Campbell on 2/25/09 (docket text order only – no document image attached) (alt) (Entered: 02/26/2009)
02/19/2009 29 MEMORANDUM in Support re 28 Plaintiff’s MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 02/19/2009)
02/19/2009 28 Plaintiff’s MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 02/19/2009)
02/19/2009 27 REPLY to Response to Motion re 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Supplemental Declaration of Timothy LeeHealey)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 02/19/2009)
02/12/2009 26 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re: 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Jurisdictional Grounds and 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment, : (Notice generated by Mary Jane McNamee) Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2009 at 2:30 PM in Room 230 before Judge Tena Campbell. (mjm) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
02/09/2009 25 ORDER OF RECUSAL-Judge J. Thomas Greene recused. Case reassigned to Judge Tena Campbell for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge J. Thomas Greene on 2/5/09. (jmr) (Entered: 02/09/2009)
02/03/2009 24 AFFIDAVIT of Tanja Giacovelli in Opposition re 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 02/03/2009)
02/03/2009 23 Defendant’s MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 02/03/2009)
02/03/2009 22 Defendant’s ANSWER to 13 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand, Defendant’s COUNTERCLAIM For Breach of Contract against Accessdata filed by ALSTE Technologies.(Wong, Samuel) (Entered: 02/03/2009)
01/09/2009 21 Case Reassigned to District Judge due to Defendant’s failure to return the Consent/Request for Reassignment Form. Case randomly assigned to Judge J. Thomas Greene. Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells no longer assigned to the case.
All previous deadlines have been vacated and will be rescheduled with Judge J. Thomas Greene (jwt) (Entered: 01/09/2009)
01/09/2009 20 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re 19 Attorney Planning Meeting. The document was filed as an Attorney Planning Meeting Report but the image is the proposed scheduling order. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. (jwt) (Entered: 01/09/2009)
01/05/2009 19 Entry Error – REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: # 1 Defendant’s Proposed Scheduling Order and Order Vacating Hearing)(Wong, Samuel) Modified on 1/9/2009 – see 20 Notice of Deficiency (jwt). (Entered: 01/05/2009)
01/05/2009 18 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Scheduling Order and Order Vacating Hearing)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/05/2009)
01/05/2009 17 DECLARATION of Timothy Leehealey re 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment, 14 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/05/2009)
01/05/2009 16 MEMORANDUM in Support re 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/05/2009)
01/05/2009 15 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/05/2009)
01/05/2009 14 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Jurisdictional Grounds filed by Plaintiff Accessdata. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/05/2009)
01/05/2009 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT against ALSTE Technologies with Jury Demand., filed by Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 01/05/2009)
12/24/2008 12 NOTICE REMINDER – All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the 8 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party’s response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.
Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (jwt) (Entered: 12/24/2008)
12/22/2008 11 ORDER granting 10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Samuel Alan Wong for ALSTE Technologies.
Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov
. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 12/22/2008. (asp) (Entered: 12/22/2008)
12/19/2008 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Samuel Alan Wong filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. Registration fee $ 15, receipt number 4681028068, Fee Status: Paid. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A – Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice, # 2 Exhibit B – Electronic Case Filing Registration Form, # 3 Exhibit C – Text of Proposed Order)(jwt) (Entered: 12/22/2008)
12/15/2008 9 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: (Notice generated by Theresa Brown)
The Attorneys Planning Meeting Report and Proposed Scheduling Order forms, available on the court web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov/documents/formpage.html, should be prepared 30 days before the Initial Pretrial Conference hearing date.

NOTICE TO COUNSEL, The Court may enter a scheduling order and vacate the hearing if counsel
(a) file a stipulated Attorneys Planning Meeting Report; and
(b) e-mail a Proposed Scheduling Order to ipt@utd.uscourts.gov
30 days before the scheduled hearing. See instructions at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov/documents/ipt.html

Initial Pretrial Conference set for 2/4/2009 11:00 AM in Room 477 before Magistrate Judge David Nuffer. (tab) (Entered: 12/15/2008)

12/08/2008 8 NOTICE – This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it to
consents@utd.uscourts.gov
within 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant ALSTE Technologies. Form due by 12/23/2008. (jwt) (Entered: 12/08/2008)
12/02/2008 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Jurisdictional Grounds filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A and B)(Egan, Sean) (Entered: 12/02/2008)
12/02/2008 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Jurisdictional Grounds filed by Defendant ALSTE Technologies. (Egan, Sean) (Entered: 12/02/2008)
11/24/2008 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Accessdata as to ALSTE Technologies served on 10/22/2008, answer due 11/21/2008. (Sears, Lannie) (Entered: 11/24/2008)
08/08/2008 4 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Accessdata. (jwt) (Entered: 08/12/2008)
08/04/2008 3 NOTICE – This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it to
consents@utd.uscourts.gov
within 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Accessdata. Form due by 8/19/2008. (jwt) (Entered: 08/04/2008)
07/31/2008 2 COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT (Jury Trial Demanded) against ALSTE Technologies (Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 10880000000000734104), filed by Accessdata. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells(Brennan, Sterling) (Entered: 07/31/2008)
07/31/2008 1 Case has been opened and assigned to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells. Plaintiff Accessdata is directed to E-File the complaint (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 350 by the end of the business day. (las) (Entered: 07/31/2008)
Date Filed: 07/31/2008
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Dieser Beitrag wurde unter Allgemein veröffentlicht. Setze ein Lesezeichen auf den Permalink.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert